Thursday, January 31, 2013

SC for peaceful burial to world’s longest case

Shias, Sunnis Fought Over Graveyard In Varanasi Since 1878

Dhananjay Mahapatra TNN 


New Delhi: The Supreme Court wants to give a “negotiated and peaceful” burial to probably the longest litigation in the world – a fight between Shias and Sunnis over a graveyard since 1878 – which continues to simmer despite SC’s judgment 32 years ago delineating their worship rights. 
    From 1878, Shias and Sunnis in Doshipura area of Varanasi have continuously fought — both on the streets and in the courts — over access to eight plots of land and two graves within it. 
    The fight continues despite a 1981 SC judgment, which gave Shias complete worship rights and asked Sunnis not to trespass. It was not implemented as the court had kept it in abeyance with the parties agreeing to find a settlement through negotiations. A settlement is nowhere in sight even as the Supreme Court has periodically agreed to give negotiations that one last chance. 
    A bench of Chief Justice Altamas Kabir and Justices A R Dave and Vikramjit Sen on Wednesday asked why the dispute, which had been settled through the 1981 judgment and subsequent orders of the apex court, be allowed to linger. 
    It asked additional advocate general Irshad Ahmed why the court should not dispose of the petition pending for the last 35 years with a direction to the UP government to implement in letter and spirit the judgment and the orders of the apex court. 
    But the court was aware of the sensitivity of the issue and the problems in implementing the judgment. The bench acknowl
edged the need for serious negotiations to arrive at an amicable settlement. 
    “We know it is a sensitive issue but nothing would be more suitable if the settlement is reached through negotiation and out of court… At some point of time, the matter should come to an end,” it said and directed the state government to inquire into the manner in which the disputed land was being used by the two communities and report back to the court. 
    The glimpses of tension underneath an uncomfortable calm prevailing at Doshipura was visible in the court as counsel for the two communities differed with each other on the purport of the apex court’s earlier directions. 
    The CJI told the two communities, “You are fighting over what, a graveyard? Don’t fight and that alone can bring lasting peace.” 

 
‘Set up PM promised 71 CBI courts in 2 months’ New Delhi:Red tape in India can even frustrate implementation of the prime 
minister’s promise to the Chief Justice of India for nearly four years. PM Manmohan Singh on July 24, 2009, wrote to the then Chief Justice of India promising to set up 71 additional CBI courts in states to help expeditious disposal of cases investigated by the central agency which were pending for years. 
    Two years ago, the SC, while dealing with CBI 
investigated cases pending for years in trial courts, had started monitoring the setting up of additional CBI courts and issued directions to the government to speed up the process of providing infrastructure and appointment of public prosecutors. On Wednesday, a bench of Justices G S Singhvi and F M I Kalifulla found that the bureaucracy had not implemented the PM’s promise to set up 71 courts. The bench told additional solicitor general Siddharth Luthra, “If you (the government) want to do it, you can do it overnight. But you do not want to do it. We have been wasting time for the last two years.” 
    On December 13 last year, Luthra had promised on behalf of the CBI that infrastructure and manpower for 22 CBI courts would be provided in three weeks. On finding that it had not been done, the court gave an eight-week ultimatum to the government to do the needful.



Source:::: The Times of India, 31-01-2013, p.13, http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Default/Client.asp?Daily=TOIM&showST=true&login=default&pub=TOI&Enter=true&Skin=TOINEW

Wednesday, January 30, 2013

Involve citizens in framing laws: Aruna


New Delhi: Against the backdrop of thousands of suggestions being made to the Justice Verma committee on crime against women, activist Aruna Roy on Monday pitched for the involvement of citizens in framing laws. In a letter to National Advisory Council chairperson Sonia Gandhi, she slammed the DoPT for playing spoilsport in establishing a mechanism of pre-legislative process. 
    Roy said such a system would not cost money and help strengthen the democratic system. “In a participatory democracy, when citizens are demanding their voice be heard, to not create an institutionalised platform for pre-legislative consultation, is unwise and self defeating. If the NAC is not considered the right platform for such a discussion, it should be taken up by some other agency immediately,” said Roy.


Source:::: The Times of India, 29-01-2013, p.14, http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Default/Client.asp?Daily=TOIM&showST=true&login=default&pub=TOI&Enter=true&Skin=TOINEW&AW=1359520806776


Consumer courts failing to deliver

Maha Has 19k Pending Cases At District Forums, National Figure Stands At 3.5L

Prerna Sodhi TNN 

(Source:::: The Times of India, 29-01-2013, p.14, http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Default/Client.asp?Daily=TOIM&showST=true&login=default&pub=TOI&Enter=true&Skin=TOINEW&AW=1359520806776)


New Delhi:After being assured by a hospital that the health of the baby in her womb was normal, a woman was shocked to find out that her little one was born without a hand and a kidney. 
    She filed a complaint with the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) hoping justice would be done. She has been waiting for two years now. And joining her in the queue are thousands of others. 
    The country’s eyes may be on criminal cases right now, but consumer courts across India are in a mess like never before. According to data released by NCDRC, over 3.5 lakh cases were pending at various consumer courts till December 21, 2012. Of these, nearly 2.5 lakh are with district consumer forums, 93,839 with state forums and 10,230 with NCDRC. 
    This, when innumerable men and women just don’t file complaints at all, unwilling to go through the hassle of fighting big firms, institutions or companies. 

    Forget bringing down the volumes, some states forums, in fact, registered a significant increase in pending cases last year. In Gujarat, the number with the state forum jumped 44% — from 4,379 in December 2011 to 7,824 in December 2012. Similarly, in Delhi, it went up from 1,195 in December 2011 to 1,579 in December 2012. Experts believe that the statistics clearly reflect a “system working at very slow pace”. 
    Go down to the districts and the story gets worse. In UP, for instance, a staggering 75,722 ag
grieved consumers are in queue with their petitions; 12,172 in Gujarat, and 19,249 in Maharashtra. It is 27,828 in Rajasthan. In Delhi, as per NCDRC data dated January 2012, the number of pending cases in district forums stand at 10,340. 
    A retired official of the Delhi state consumer forum who did not wish to be named said, “Even though in the last two years the number of pending cases in district forums has decreased, that decrease has been marginal.” Experts said that to prevent the numbers from rising further 
courts need to dispose of complaints at the rate they are being filed, which is proving to be tough given the existing pile-up, poor infrastructure and staff crunch. An official at the New Delhi district consumer forum says that on a daily basis they hear, on an average, 140 complaints. They are able to dispose only three. 
    Bejon Misra, a veteran consumer rights activist, said the number of petitions out there is hardly indicative of the amount of unfair practices that people have to endure. “Many just move on,” he said. “To deter these violations, forums should start penalizing companies and asking them why cases come to forums in the first place.” 
    Advocate Ankit Jain said there should be division of cases on a priority basis. 
    “People spend a lot of their hard earned money on real estate projects or insurances only to realize they are being harassed when the time comes to deliver on the promises. Certain cases should be acted upon immediately, as most companies benefit from the delay.”


Tuesday, January 22, 2013

CURRENT OPENINGS
 Dear Law School Deans,
We would like to take this opportunity to introduce Khemka & Associates - Advocates & Solicitors, a new age start up law firm looking for graduate and student candidates for open positions at our firm and humbly invite applicant's from you esteemed law school.
We have attached all the possible information required with this email, but don't hesitate to contact us if you require any additional information.
This is a brief on our firm and its vision:
KHEMKA & ASSOCIATES – Advocates and Solicitors is a new age firm looking for young and dynamic legal talent. Today, in the world of rare opportunities for the younger generation, our endeavor remains to train young individuals with a different approach, help them empower themselves and become self-reliant. Our aim is to provide opportunities for students to gain practical experience in research and writing, exposure to cutting edge issues facing the judiciary, and to give them a platform to engage in discussions with leaders in various fields of law and related disciplines.
CURRENT OPENINGS
Lawyers
Location: Mumbai
Qualification: LLB Graduates (Called to the Bar)
Key Skills: Strong Communication Skills *Verbal and Written, Ability to Work in Different Environments and Quick Thinkers. Strong Legal Research skills are necessary, which should be evident from internships and research projects undertaken during law school.
Responsibilities: Assisting in client counseling, Interpret laws, rulings and regulations for individuals and businesses including the parent company and its brands with all its in-house legal work. Present and summarize cases to judges. Evaluate findings and develop strategies and arguments in preparation for presentation of cases. There will be litigation as well as non-litigation work involved.
Salary: Will be determined on the basis of experience and minimum period of work commitment.
Legal Interns
Location: Mumbai
Qualification: 2nd, 3rd, 4th and Final Year Students of the BLS/LLB Course and 1st and 2nd year students of the LLB Course.
Key Skills: Good Communication Skills *Verbal and Written, Willingness and Ability to learn in Different Environments.
Responsibilities: Assistance in all aspects of litigation, including legal research, factual investigation, and drafting of memoranda and briefs. Keeping track on and Follow-ups on court dates and case status. Assist other legal officers in the firm.
Stipend: Will be determined according to the work assignments. 
Please let us know if you would like a representative of our firm to visit you, or you would like to be emailed specifications of the internship and placement programs.

Regards,

Mansha Khemka
careers@khemkaassociates.com
mansha.khemka@khemkaassociates.com
www.khemkaassociates.com


516, Midas, Sahar Plaza, A. K. Road, Andheri East, Mumbai 400053
Phone: 91 22 4217 1717 Fax: 91 22 4217 1727

Monday, January 21, 2013

NOTICE

We are happy to inform all the students that the College has procured the following TWO new products viz.:
  • Manupatra online legal database and 
  •  CD-ROM database containing cases of Supreme Court &   Bombay High Court.

Hence, all the students are hereby informed to make maximum use of the same.

Dr. Veeresh Hanchinal
Librarian

Friday, January 18, 2013

Timetable for HSC changed


Shreya Bhandary TNN 

 

Mumbai: Following demands from HSC science students and teachers across Maharashtra, the state board has announced a change in the timetable of the Class-XII exams that will start on February 21. 
    The dates for chemistry and biology papers have been changed after students and teachers pointed out that more time was needed to study the subjects’ revised syllabuses. “Keeping with the CBSE curriculum, our syllabuses have been upgraded but the courses have become more difficult than CBSE papers. Moreover, while CBSE has given their students four days to prepare for every paper, we were slotted only one day,” said Rishikesh Mhatre, a student of Ruparel College. After students across the state wrote to the education minister, a debate was held at Mantralaya on Thursday and the new timetable was announced. 

    The HSC chemistry paper, which was slated for February 27, will now be held on March 26. The Biology paper has been postponed from March 4 to 17. One of the two new dates is kept on a Sunday so that it does not clash with any other board exams. The HSC results will be announced before June 5. Students can visitwww.msbshse.ac.in to check the changed timetable. 
    Confirming the demands, 
Krishnarao Patil, in-charge secretary, state board, said, “The new syllabuses were framed based on National Curriculum Framework. Following students’ and teachers’ demand, the state took a decision on Thursday,” said Patil. 
    Professors have also threatened to boycott the exams if two more of their demands are not fulfilled. “The state upgraded the syllabus but didn’t check if teachers could finish the course. The board has also done away with external examiners for practicals. The board must make changes or we will boycott,” said Anil Singh of Mumbai Junior College Teachers’ Association.



Source:::: The Times of India, 18-01-2013, p.02, http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Default/Client.asp?Daily=TOIM&showST=true&login=default&pub=TOI&Enter=true&Skin=TOINEW&AW=1358485709575 



Give Flat or 1cr to Buyer, Consumer Forum to Bldr.

Rebecca Samervel TNN 


Mumbai: The Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission has directed a builder to hand over a 712 sq ft flat at Sion within four months or pay Rs 1.04 crore compensation to an ex-serviceman who had booked the flat in 2005, but has not got possession. 
    The commission observed, “Because of the delay in getting possession, complainant is deprived of his dream of having his own house… Rates of real estate have skyrocketed and increased geometrically, the opponents have utilized the hard-earned money of consideration paid by the complainant and one cannot say how long he will have to wait.” 
    Amarjeet Singh Baryam Singh filed the complaint in the commission on July 19, 2011, against M/s Lakadawala Developers Pvt Ltd and its directors, for deficiencyin service. 
    While the flat was booked in August 2005, the agreement was registered in March 2006. Singh paid the entire amount of Rs 24.65 lakh to the builder and construction was to be completed by the end of 2007. He contended that that he tried to contact the builder from time to time but never received possession. Singh alleged that due to this, he was financially overburdened and was undergoing tremendous mental agony. The builder submitted that the property was being developed under the Slum Rehabilitation Scheme and had encountered some trouble. The builder alleged that the building was completed but had to be demolished due to some problems. The firm further contended that as per the agreement, the complainant is entitled to take possession of the flat on completion of the project and if it is delayed, the builder will not be liable. They said that they were willing to hand over possession after completion of the project or alternatively Singh could take a refund. The commission, however, said that the efforts made by the builder look half-hearted. “We are not convinced about the efforts taken by the opponents. Similarly, the complainant cannot wait indefinitely to have his own house,” the commission said. 
    Taking into account the market rate of the property, the commission held that the current value of the flat was Rs 99.27 lakh.

Source:::: The Times of India, 18-01-2013, p.02, http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Default/Client.asp?Daily=TOIM&showST=true&login=default&pub=TOI&Enter=true&Skin=TOINEW&AW=1358485709575